O$ programming style

Thanks you Andrea, Ken and Doug for your very reassuring responses.

> On 19 Dec 2017, at 6:59 am, Doug Easterbrook <doug@artsman.com> wrote:
>
> hi Mike
>
> to add to what ken and andrea said… — yes sticking things into objects have benefits.
>
> but don’t forget that table classes are also objects and can encapsulate a lot of stuff.
>
> sometimes there are objects in table classes. sometimes there are table classes in objects.
>
> depends what you need to accomplish — but yes, there should be separation from the window. its worth it.
>
>
>
>
> Doug Easterbrook
> Arts Management Systems Ltd.
> mailto:doug@artsman.com
> www.artsman.com
> Phone (403) 650-1978
>
>
>
>
> see you at the third annual users conference
> tickets.proctors.org/TheatreManager/95/online?performance=29086 <tickets.proctors.org/TheatreManager/95/online?performance=29086>
>
>> On Dec 18, 2017, at 6:46 AM, Mike Rowan <michael.rowan3@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have recently written a lot of code using the idea that ‘Omnis Programming’ seems to suggest, namely having almost no operational code in the methods of a window, by shifting them to an object instantiated as an instance variable of type object of the window.
>>
>> I’n not sure I see any advantage for a desktop library, and wonder what I have missed. In fact it seems to add a whole extra layer of pain.
>>
>> Meanwhile, seasons greetings to all
>>
>> Mike
>> _____________________________________________________________
>> Manage your list subscriptions at lists.omnis-dev.com
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> Manage your list subscriptions at lists.omnis-dev.com

_____________________________________________________________
Manage your list subscriptions at lists.omnis-dev.com